STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE MANUFACTURING INVESTIGATION REPORTING SYSTEM.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
MANUFACTURING INVESTIGATION REPORTING SYSTEM.
|
DEPARTMENT : QA
SOP NO. :
Page No :
Effective Date :
Next Review :
SOP REVISION :
|
1.0 OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this procedure is
to identify the events (variances, discrepancies, unplanned deviations) in
manufacturing, packing, distribution and handling of Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients that are subject to investigation, to describe the procedure and
timelines for investigations, it’s reporting to management, tracking &
trending of investigations, and documentation.
2.0 POLICY:
2.1 This procedure is applicable to
manufacturing, testing and warehousing operations.
2.2
This procedure shall be followed if
any of the following events is observed:
2.2.1 Damaged
or unlabelled or incorrect receipt of raw materials,
2.2.2 Improper sampling techniques,
2.2.3 Incorrect dispersal of R.M/P.M
2.2.4 Use of unapproved or incorrect production
material,
2.2.5 Use of wrong version or unapproved document,
2.2.6 Equipment / instrument not in calibrated
state or out of tolerance or status
stickers missing,
2.2.7 Violation / Deviations from established, validated procedure,
process parameters or system during manufacturing or testing.
2.2.8 Environmental
parameters exceeding action limits,
2.2.9 Fortification,
2.2.10 In-process
failure,
2.2.11 Any
equipment, instrument or procedure (system) failure that may or may not create
hazard to the product quality and may or may not result in quality problem,
2.2.12 Any human
error / failure that may or may not result in any type of quality problem,
Spillage, drain or loss of raw / packaging material,
2.2.13 Reprocessing in manufacturing, is permissible for tablets, liquid
orals etc. No reprocessing is allowed for Creams, Lotions & Ointments.
2.2.14 Laboratory out of specification when the test
results indicate the problem in manufacturing,
2.2.15 Testing not performed within established
timeframe or not performed at all,
2.2.16 Product complaint and recalls,
2.2.17 Contamination / Cross Contamination,
2.2.18 Calculation errors, missing reading or
entries,
2.2.19 Incorrect dispatch of finished goods,
2.2.20 Reduction in approved expiration etc….
2.2.21 Any event
that is not listed above but is vital for the cost and quality of the product
shall be considered.
2.3 KEY ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
2.3.1 All personnel : Identify and communicate reportable event.
2.3.2 The
Section In charge: Take immediate actions, Initiating investigation form,
taking necessary corrective actions and preventive measures, follow up for the
action getting authorization, attaching a Copy of completed investigation form
to BMR and submitting original form to QA.
2.3.3 Head of
the : Completing the Investigation
procedure within Department stipulated time.
2.3.4 Manager, Q.A. : Assigning numbers to investigation
2.3.5 Investigation team : Conduct thorough and timely investigation involving
concerned personnel
2.3.6 Quality Council: Ensure effectiveness
of corrective actions
and measure the performance
of the investigation process.
2.4 DEFINITIONS
Assignable Cause - A
documented and scientifically justified determination made by the laboratory
that the discrepant result is due to laboratory error. This is detailed in a
Laboratory Investigation Report. [Note: Assignable cause is congruent with the
term “determinate cause.” The absence of an assignable cause is known as an
“indeterminate cause.”]
Batch Failure – A
determination of unacceptability of a critical quality attribute based upon at
least one (1) confirmed out-of-specification laboratory result that should
result in rejection of the batch.
Manufacturing
Investigation – A formal process employed to investigate and
recommend appropriate corrective actions stemming from a confirmed laboratory
out-of-specification result (related to production or support services) for
which no laboratory assignable cause has been identified or conclusively
proven. A cross-functional team composed of departmental representatives from Quality;
Manufacturing etc will conduct an investigation.
Manufacturing
Investigation Report (MIR) - The detailed, centrally archived document that
constitutes a compilation of the documents generated during the manufacturing
related investigation process, i.e., Laboratory Investigation Report and
Manufacturing Investigation findings.
Manufacturing
Discrepancy - Any outcome of a procedure or an occurrence during
the performance of a production operation differing from the normal or
expected.
Out-of-Specification
(OOS) Result - All results that fall outside the specifications or
acceptance criteria established in new drug applications, official compendia or
by the manufacturer.
Planned Deviation: A deviation that is known to all
functionary departments before the issue of batch manufacturing record. (E.g:
Non availability of secondary packing materials like literature, labels etc.
before the start of manufacturing).
Unplanned
Deviation: A
deviation that happens during the process of Manufacturing & Packing due to
sudden breakdown of equipment etc. (E.g. Break down of online coding machine
and coding done off line).
ABBREVIATIONS
MIR - Manufacturing Investigation Report
HOD - Head of the Department
GMP
- Good Manufacturing
Practices
QA - Quality Assurance
IMR -
Integrated Management Report
OOS - Out of Specification
3.0 PROCEDURE:
3.1 The area in-charge shall report the incident verbally to the
Department Head who in turn shall report the same to the Q.A. Head and Facility
Head within one business day.
3.2 Q.A. Manager shall allot the investigation form number as
follows upon receipt of the notification.
Constitution of the No : Year / Serial Number
The year shall be 03, 04, 05 for the years 2003, 2004,
2005, etc…
The Sr. No. shall be 01 to n for a year. Shall start
from 01 from next January.
3.3 The Management representative of the area where any of the
event as explained in the scope is observed shall complete the Part I & II
of the manufacturing investigation report form (Hereinafter referred as MIR
form, attached to this SOP) within three working days and submit it to the
department Head for further action.
3.4 The Section In-charge shall withhold and quarantine (isolate)
the affected lot / batch until the final batch disposition is decided /
suggested by the investigation team.
3.5 A team
of Department Head (Team Leader), Section In-charge of the area (who had initiated
the investigation form) and a Q.A. representative shall conduct / complete the
investigations within 30 days of the occurrence of the event.
3.6 The
Department Head shall decide upon the investigation date (planning) and
additional decision criteria, if any, in consultation / concurrence with Q.A.
and other team members including the principal company representative.
3.7 The
Department Head, from time to time, shall report verbally to the Management
about the progress of the investigation if required.
3.8 The
Section In-charge (who had initiated the investigation form) shall take the
corrective actions and preventive measures as recommended in the MIR form by
the specified date.
3.9 The Section In-charge shall get approval
of the Q.A. Manager and facility Head.
3.10 Q.A. Manager shall indicate his views in
the of investigation form about various requirements.
3.11 The Q.A.
Department shall submit a copy of duly authorized MIR form for Q.A. concurrence
if it is indicated on the form. The final lot disposition shall be done upon
receipt of Principal concurrence
3.12 The
Section In-charge shall intimate to Q.A. Executive and seek his acknowledgement
on the MIR form when MIR review is required before batch release.
3.13 The
Section In-charge shall complete / close out the investigation process by
completing the MIR form, attach a copy of
duly completed &
approved MIR to
batch manufacturing /
packing records and submit the original
investigation form to Q.A.
The original Investigation form shall be maintained in
Q.A.
3.14 Investigation
procedure and completed Investigation Forms are confidential Company documents.
Photocopying and / or giving it to outside personnel / agencies is not
permitted except approved by Q.A.
3.15 GUIDELINES
FOR VARIOUS ASPECTS OF INVESTIGATIONS:
3.15.1 LOT DISPOSITION:
3.15.1.1 If the quality of the product is suspected
to be adversely affected OR accessed as adversely affected, the affected batch
or part of the batch shall be destroyed as per relevant procedure.
3.15.1.2 If the quality of the product may not
be adversely affected by reprocessing or repacking, it can be done so as per
relevant procedure.
3.15.1.3 Follow the recall
procedure for goods recalled or returned from market.
3.15.1.4 The
Q.A. shall be informed by Section In-charge / Department Head about the
incident before the final release of the affected batch / lot.
3.15.2 IMPACT OF THE PROBLEM:
3.15.2.1 If
the problem has potential to impact other lots, products, validated processes
or systems negatively, it can be indicated in the investigation form.
3.15.2.2 The
Head of Department shall suggest / take necessary corrective actions/
preventive measures.
3.15.2.3 He shall keep necessary
documentation for the actions.
3.15.3 NO ASSIGNABLE CAUSE:
3.15.3.1 The Head of Department shall extend
the investigations to the previous and / or next batches, processes, products
or systems if the investigation is concluded with ‘No Assignable Cause.’
3.15.3.2 The
same shall be indicated in the investigation form.
3.15.3.3 The
Section In-charge shall complete MIR form.
3.15.4 PRINCIPAL
Q.A. CONCURRENCE:
3.15.4.1 Following situations
require principal Q.A. concurrence before final disposition.
3.15.4.2 Market
recalls,
3.15.4.3 Product
mix ups,
3.15.4.4 Suspected
contaminations,
3.15.4.5 Yield
alert,
3.15.4.6 Reduction
in approved expiration,
3.15.4.7 Events
that has potentially affected the quality, safety or efficacy of the product,
3.15.4.8 Batches
failing in release testing,
3.15.4.9 When MIRs require Q.A. concurrence, a
copy of duly completed locally approved MIR shall be submitted to Q.A.
3.15.4.10 If Q.A. concurs with batch / lot disposition recommendations,
they shall return approved copy to the site Q.A. head. The affected batch / lot
shall be disposed upon concurrence.
3.15.4.11 If Q.A. do not concurs with the MIR recommendations,
additional information / Executive summary shall be provided or amended MIR
shall be submitted.
3.15.4.12 Q.A. shall provide their final decision
to concur or not.
3.15.5 METRICS:
3.15.5.1 All the departments shall maintain
records as suggested by IMR co- coordinators and report the metrics on regular
basis.
3.15.5.2 The Quality Council shall review the
metrics to identify and recommend Corrective actions and preventive measures
and monitor the effectiveness of the actions.
4.0 FREQUENCY: As and
when required.
5.0 RESPONSIBILITY:
GM-QA, Manager-Production.
6.0 REVIEW GUIDE: Manufacturing investigation report.
7.0 ANNEXURE:
1. Manufacturing Investigation Report Form (MIR Form)
8.0 SOPs
DISTRIBUTION:
This
SOP shall be distributed to following Departments:
Name of the Department
|
Master Copy
|
Circulatory Copy
|
QA/QC
|
√
|
√
|
Production
|
x
|
√
|
Warehouse
|
x
|
x
|
General
|
x
|
x
|
Maintenance
|
x
|
x
|
Comments
Post a Comment